There is a taboo that transcends all parts of society: don’t hit below the belt. More specifically, don’t hit guys below the belt. We all know how vulnerable men are when it comes to their testicles. The question is, why should women care? Why should they uphold a taboo that only protects testicles, organs they don’t particularly care about?
From martial arts and sport to everyday life, it is taboo to go after the testicles. A rule that serves men well. Their greatest vulnerability, a weakness like no other, is protected by it. We have all been indoctrinated to believe that it is evil to attack the testicles, that one should do so only in the gravest of emergencies. But that’s just what men want the world to think.
Why Protect Testicles?
If you look at it from a neutral point of view, what is the reason to protect the testicles at all cost? They are a part of the human body like any other, what’s more, they are not a vital organ. The majority of human beings lives fine without them. If feminists rose up overnight and castrated 90% of all men, there would still be more than enough testicles left for the human species to continue.
No, the extreme protection of testicles is something that men have instituted for a simple selfish reason — to compensate for their humiliating weakness, the pathetic vulnerability of testicles. There is no cult of shielding the penis or the vagina from all harm, nobody is going around and writing rules to protect the ovaries into every sport. It’s not all organs that are part of human reproduction that are supposedly off limits, it’s only the testicles.
Why Should Women Care?
The simple truth is that having testicles puts men at a disadvantage. They are a major weakness in an easily accessible location. So why should women not use that to their advantage?
After millennia of patriarchy, where men have used every trick and every tool to oppress women, isn’t it right that women would use a simple fact of nature, the vulnerability of testicles, against men? Men don’t hesitate to use their on average greater height and strength to their advantage, so why should women hold back?
When Sonja walks home late at night, and she doesn’t like the look of a guy who asks her for the time, why shouldn’t she kick him in the balls with full force, just to be safe? When a guy in a bar gets too close to Iris, why shouldn’t she knee him in the nuts so hard he starts to cry like a baby? If Barbara gets in a fight with a male friend, and he gets all aggressive, why shouldn’t she tame him by grab-twist-pulling his fragile testicles?
Fairness
The rules and taboos that protect testicles are only in place to give men an advantage, to hide their natural disadvantage. You might call it unfair to use such a humiliating vulnerability against men, but when have they ever played fair? Isn’t it about time women played rough?
If Michelle crushed her boyfriend’s balls every time he raises his voice, his behavior would improve in no time. If Claire sent her husband to the floor in agony every time he “forgot” to do a chore, how forgetful would he really be? If Jake had to fear ruptured testicles whenever he talks to a girl, how well-behaved would he be?
When you attack the testicles, you cause the man great pain. But you also attack his mind, his virility, his identity as a strong man. You expose and exploit his vulnerability, you effortlessly bring him to his knees. Men created a taboo to protect themselves. They have gotten away with it for too long. It is time for women to grab not only life, but men, by the balls. Literally.
Ballbusting Bulletin 
Leave a comment